{"id":3347,"date":"2008-10-17T01:43:30","date_gmt":"2008-10-17T00:43:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.filmdetail.com\/?p=3347"},"modified":"2008-11-03T04:48:12","modified_gmt":"2008-11-03T03:48:12","slug":"lff-2008-synecdoche-new-york","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.filmdetail.com\/2008\/10\/17\/lff-2008-synecdoche-new-york\/","title":{"rendered":"LFF 2008: Synecdoche, New York"},"content":{"rendered":"
In the last decade Charlie Kaufman<\/a> has become one of those rare screenwriters whose work has even overshadowed the directors he has worked with.\u00a0<\/p>\n This is quite a feat given that he has collaborated with Spike Jonze<\/a> (on Being John Malkovich<\/a> and Adaptation<\/a>) and Michel Gondry<\/a> (Human Nature<\/a> and Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind<\/a>).\u00a0<\/p>\n However, it is fair to say that all those films bear certain recognisable tropes: ingenious narratives, surreal images and a tragi-comic view of human affairs.<\/p>\n It would also be fair to assume that his directorial debut would be similar, but Synecdoche, New York<\/strong><\/a> does not just bear token similarities to his previous scripts.\u00a0<\/p>\n In fact it is so Kaufman-esque<\/em> that it takes his ideas to another level of strangeness, which is quite something if you bear in mind what has come before.<\/p>\n The story centres around a theatre director named\u00a0Caden Cotard<\/a>\u00a0(Philip Seymour Hoffman<\/a>) who starts to re-evaluate life after both his health and marriage start to break down.\u00a0<\/p>\n He receives a grant to do something artistically adventurous and decides to stage an enormously ambitious production inside a giant warehouse.<\/p>\n What follows is a strange and often baffling movie, complete with the kind of motifs that are peppered throughout Kaufman’s scripts: someone lives in a house oblivious to the fact that it is permanently on fire; a theatrical venue the size of several aircraft hangars is casually described as a place where Shakespeare is performed; and visitors to an art gallery view microscopic paintings with special goggles.\u00a0<\/p>\n It explores the big issues of life and death but also examines the nature of art and performance – a lot of the film, once it goes inside the warehouse, is a mind-boggling meditation on our lives as a performance.\u00a0<\/p>\n Imagine The Truman Show<\/a> rewritten by Samuel Beckett<\/a> and directed by\u00a0Luis Bu\u00f1uel<\/a>\u00a0and you’ll get some idea of what Kaufman is aiming for here.\u00a0<\/p>\n I found a lot of the humour very funny, but the comic sensibility behind the jokes is dry and something of an acquired taste.<\/p>\n Much of the film hinges on Seymour Hoffman’s outstanding central performance in which he conveys the vulnerability and determination of a man obsessed with doing something worthwhile before he dies.\u00a0<\/p>\n The makeup for the characters supervised by Mike Marino<\/a>\u00a0is also first rate, creating a believable ageing process whilst the sets are also excellent, even if some of the CGI isn’t always 100% convincing.\u00a0<\/p>\n The supporting cast too is very impressive:\u00a0Catherine Keener<\/a>,\u00a0Michelle Williams<\/a>,\u00a0Samantha Morton<\/a>,\u00a0Emily Watson<\/a>,\u00a0Hope Davis<\/a>,\u00a0Tom Noonan<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0Dianne Weist<\/a>\u00a0all contribute fine performances and fit nicely into the overall tone of the piece.\u00a0<\/p>\n Although the world Kaufman creates will alienate some viewers, it slowly becomes a haunting meditation on how humans age and die.<\/p>\n As the film moves towards resolution it becomes surprisingly moving with some of the deeper themes slowly, but powerfully, rising to the surface.<\/p>\n This means that although it will have it’s admirers (of which I certainly include myself) it is likely to prove too esoteric for mass consumption as it has a downbeat tone despite the comic touches.<\/p>\n Having seen it only once, this is a film I instantly wanted to revisit, so dense are the layers and concepts contained within it.<\/p>\n On first viewing it became a bit too rich at times for it’s own good. However, it isn’t often that filmmakers aim this high.<\/p>\n I certainly haven’t seen a film like this in years.<\/p>\n N.B.\u00a0Apparently the first word of the title is pronounced \u201cSyn-ECK-duh-kee\u201d.\u00a0<\/p>\n The following video from Cannes back in May showed the confusion over how to pronounce it:<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n
<\/a>But despite the oddities and the Chinese-box narrative, this is a film overflowing with invention and ideas.\u00a0<\/p>\n