{"id":8858,"date":"2010-08-19T23:59:03","date_gmt":"2010-08-19T22:59:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.filmdetail.com\/?p=8858"},"modified":"2010-08-27T01:05:01","modified_gmt":"2010-08-27T00:05:01","slug":"scott-pilgrim-vs-the-world-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.filmdetail.com\/2010\/08\/19\/scott-pilgrim-vs-the-world-review\/","title":{"rendered":"Scott Pilgrim vs The World"},"content":{"rendered":"
[ad]<\/p>\n A nerd fantasia designed for an audience obsessed with comics and video games, Scott Pilgrim vs. The World<\/a><\/strong> is a crushing disappointment.<\/p>\n Adapted from Bryan Lee O\u2019Malley\u2019s comic series<\/a>, it is the story of a Toronto bass playing geek (Michael Cera<\/a>) who falls in love with a delivery girl named Ramona Flowers (Mary Elizabeth Winstead<\/a>), only to realise he must fight her \u2018seven evil exes\u2019.<\/p>\n What follows is an action-comedy hybrid in which director Edgar Wright<\/a> throws a barrage of visual artillery at the screen in order to recreate the look of comics and computer games.<\/p>\n A bewildering array of techniques are employed throughout: split-screen, aspect-ratio shifts, zooms, CGI, animation, super-quick edits, Manga-styled transitions and laugh tracks are just some of the tools used in dramatising Pilgrim\u2019s journey.<\/p>\n In some ways the ambition of the film is admirable. Like The Wachowski Bros’ Speed Racer<\/a> (2008) it tries to do something genuinely different with the visual language of cinema.<\/p>\n But also like that film, it remains a hollow exercise in cinematic technique that contains little emotion or charm beneath the endless layers of visual distraction.<\/p>\n Compared to Wright\u2019s previous work, the central characters are surprisingly hard to care for. The protagonist is a dull, self-obsessed narcissist, whilst the girl he is fighting for doesn\u2019t seem to care all that much. As for the exes they are just levels to be completed.<\/p>\n Michael Cera now seems entombed in the nebbish screen persona audiences first saw in Superbad<\/a> (2007). That splendid breakout performance has now become a depressing template for his subsequent career.<\/p>\n The exes he does battle with (including Chris Evans, Brandon Routh and Jason Schwartzman) are little more than one-note jokes and the whole narrative feels like TV episodes stitched together to resemble a feature.<\/p>\n Wright has previously managed to combine visual flair with genuine heart. With the TV series Spaced<\/a> (1999-2001) and his last two films, Shaun of the Dead<\/a> (2004) and Hot Fuzz<\/a> (2007), he managed a great balance of humour, brains and genuine emotion.<\/p>\n This film has many surface similarities with Spaced: twenty-something slackers, a frenetic editing and shooting style, numerous pop culture references and a slow-burning romance.<\/p>\n But in Scott Pilgrim the techniques are turned up to such a degree that they squeeze the life out of the core story and it is hard to care about anything on screen.<\/p>\n The one noticeable improvement over Wright\u2019s previous films is the clarity and crispness of Bill Pope<\/a>\u2019s cinematography, but that only comes across in the more realistic scenes, which are frequently intercut with a barrage of hyperactive effects.<\/p>\n Certain sequences feel like a visual dirty bomb<\/a> has gone off in the cinema. But for what? A romantic story with little romance and characters on screen who are almost literally cartoons?<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n
<\/a>This means when characters ring a doorbell we actually see the sound visualised with a \u201cDing-Dong\u201d and when characters are punched we see \u201cKa-Pows!\u201d like the 1960s Batman series<\/a>.<\/p>\n