{"id":8978,"date":"2010-09-01T02:12:32","date_gmt":"2010-09-01T01:12:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.filmdetail.com\/?p=8978"},"modified":"2010-09-02T23:05:14","modified_gmt":"2010-09-02T22:05:14","slug":"in-defence-of-blu-ray-the-godfather-psycho","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.filmdetail.com\/2010\/09\/01\/in-defence-of-blu-ray-the-godfather-psycho\/","title":{"rendered":"In Defence of Blu-ray"},"content":{"rendered":"
Blu-ray<\/a> won’t be as successful as DVD but it is still the best way to watch a properly restored film at home.<\/p>\n A recent post<\/a> on The Guardian’s film blog by Shane Danielson titled ‘The devil is in Blu-ray’s detail<\/a>‘ put forward the notion that the sharpness of Blu-ray is somehow a problem.<\/p>\n For those still unaware of it, Blu<\/a>-ray is the high definition successor to the DVD<\/a>, an optical disc format for which you need a specific player and an HD television.<\/p>\n As someone who was once a partial sceptic of HD formats, at least until the industry sorted out the ludicrous format war<\/a> and high prices, I read Danielson’s post with a mixture of intrigue and then gradual disbelief.<\/p>\n I suspect it was meant to be a contrarian think-piece putting forward the notion that the upgrade to Blu-ray isn’t really worth it.<\/p>\n Well, it is certainly true that commercial imperatives have driven the shift to Blu-ray, as broadcasters and consumers gradually move to digital and high definition.<\/p>\n If you want to buy a new TV, you will be hard pressed to find one that isn’t an HD set.<\/p>\n One of Danielson’s points is that too much detail revealed in a high definition version of a film can be a bad thing, but he makes some key mistakes in highlighting the Blu-ray versions of Psycho and The Godfather.<\/p>\n For a piece with the word ‘detail’ in the title, he gets Martin Balsam<\/a>‘s name wrong (calling him ‘Robert’) and there is no mention whatsoever of how the whole film actually looks on the format.<\/p>\n Furthermore, it is a little silly to complain about the strings on Martian spaceships in the Blu-ray version of George Pal\u2019s The War of the Worlds, especially when no such version of the film actually exists<\/a>. (I can only assume he is referring to the DVD version<\/a>, which kind of undercuts his wider point).<\/p>\n Having actually seen the Psycho Blu-ray<\/a>, I can only repeat my admiration for the team who oversaw its transfer as it looks marvellous and, as someone who has only ever seen it on television, the sharpness and clarity of the image makes a welcome change.<\/p>\n As for the make-up on Balsam’s head<\/a> in a particular scene, it isn’t really noticeable unless you want to freeze the image and analyse the split second it occurs.<\/p>\n I get the idea that some people take issue when certain elements of a film are ‘corrected’ for the Blu-ray release, such as when DNR is used to smooth out the image (e.g. the new Predator Blu-ray<\/a>) but in this case I don’t think the argument stands up at all.<\/p>\n The restoration of The Godfather Blu-ray<\/a> is another matter entirely.<\/p>\n I remember being in the Virgin Megastore in Times Square back in 2008, and pausing to look at a screen showing Coppola’s The Godfather, which had been released on Blu-ray a fortnight earlier.<\/p>\n It was the trattoria sequence, when Michael kills McCluskey and Sollozzo, and it looked great . . . in fact, it looked TOO great.<\/p>\n The colours were rich and burnished (that background red, in particular), the shadows were deep \u2013 yet at the same time, there was a precision to the images, a sort of hyperreal clarity, that didn’t jibe with my memory of having watched the film, either in the cinema or at home.<\/p>\n It seemed weirdly artificial, somehow, and watching it, I felt that I could almost see the grain of the film stock, the flicker and shudder of individual frames, such was the degree of visual information on offer.<\/p>\n I felt, suddenly, like Ray Milland’s character in The Man With the X-Ray Eyes. This could, I realised, drive me mad, if I let it.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Aside from the fact that it is highly dubious to make a judgement on a transfer from one scene observed in shop two years ago, he couldn\u2019t have picked a worse one to illustrate his point.<\/p>\n Not only is the restored Blu-ray version of The Godfather<\/a> a thing of beauty to behold, it is probably probably one of the landmark releases in the format, overseen with great care and attention by restoration guru Robert Harris<\/a>.<\/p>\n Anyone who actually watches<\/em> the complete version of The Godfather on Blu-ray, rather than idly chatting to a Virgin Megastore employee, will actually realise this.<\/p>\n There is also a twenty minute feature titled ‘Emulsion Rescue’ which details the painstaking task of restoring this sequence, featuring interviews with director Francis Ford Coppola, cinematographer Gordon Willis and others involved in the process.<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n
<\/a>After all, who needs to fork out extra for a format in which you can see the make-up on actor\u2019s face? Isn\u2019t it all just a big money making scheme to make us replace our DVD collection?<\/p>\n
<\/a>Danielson says:<\/p>\n