{"id":9553,"date":"2010-10-27T21:07:59","date_gmt":"2010-10-27T20:07:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.filmdetail.com\/?p=9553"},"modified":"2010-10-28T12:49:28","modified_gmt":"2010-10-28T11:49:28","slug":"lff-2010-inside-job","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.filmdetail.com\/2010\/10\/27\/lff-2010-inside-job\/","title":{"rendered":"LFF 2010: Inside Job"},"content":{"rendered":"
Charles Ferguson\u2019s documentary explores the global financial crisis<\/a> with devastating clarity and paints a deeply troubling picture of the relationship between financial<\/a> and political<\/a> elites.<\/p>\n Within the space of just two hours, using interviews, graphics, impressive editing and a sober narration from Matt Damon, Inside Job takes us through the causes of the current economic meltdown<\/a>.<\/p>\n Beginning with a startling prologue examining how Iceland\u2019s economy was essentially ruined by big finance<\/a>, it sets up in microcosm the the wider story of how, over a period of 30 years, successive governments have allowed large financial institutions to inflate an economic system until it eventually burst in the autumn of 2008<\/a>.<\/p>\n Interviewing a variety of experts and policy makers including Nouriel Roubini<\/a>,\u00a0George Soros<\/a>, Eliot Spitzer<\/a>, Barney Frank<\/a> and Christine Lagarde<\/a> it takes us step-by-step through the deregulation of the financial industry<\/a> under successive presidents from Regan\u00a0onwards.<\/p>\n We are presented with a non-partisan examination of how Republicans and Democrats were seduced by financial sector: the Reagan-era deregulation<\/a> of Wall Street, which led to the Savings and loan crisis<\/a>; the Clinton administration\u2019s numerous mistakes in repealing key laws designed<\/a> to minimize risk in the financial sector; the lack of regulation under Bush<\/a>;\u00a0the rise in derivatives<\/a> (increasingly complex and dangerous financial \u2018innovations\u2019<\/a>); and finally the Obama administration, which made the mistake of employing Clinton-era officials<\/a> who were part of the original problem.<\/p>\n Ferguson himself cross-examines a number of government and private sector officials – though many of the key culprits refused to be interviewed – and his probing questions elicit some revealing requests to stop filming when they appear unexpectedly thrown by certain questions.<\/p>\n One startling aspect of the film is how much academics, supposedly independent from Wall Street banks, are actually paid by them for opinions or even serve on their boards – a clear conflict of interest which several of them appear oblivious to.<\/p>\n Using a sober tone throughout, the narration, interview footage and graphics all collate and explain the financial jargon of CDOs<\/a>, credit default swaps<\/a> and the policies which left much of the public scratching their head as they tried to process the full extent of what happened.<\/p>\n But this is more than just an academic primer: featuring widescreen lensing, aerial shots of New York and some appropriate music (the opening credits feature Peter Gabriel\u2019s \u2018Big Time<\/a>\u2019) it is a cinematic experience, which visually reflects the gravity of the subject.<\/p>\n The relentless approach is both appropriate and effective, although it also reveals some ghoulish comedy when exploring the widespread use of cocaine<\/a> and prostitutes<\/a> on Wall St and the stuttering angst of interviewees caught out by Ferguson\u2019s well-researched questions.<\/p>\n One of the most damning aspects to arise from Inside Job is the incestuous nature of the relationship<\/a> between Washington and Wall Street.<\/p>\n The revolving door connecting the political and financial worlds, along with figures such as Henry Paulson<\/a>, Lawrence Summers<\/a> and Robert Rubin<\/a>, has effectively shielded large banks from any effective regulation.<\/p>\n The result of this has been the largest financial crash in history<\/a>, which almost brought down the whole banking system in 2008<\/a> and resulted in millions of people losing their jobs and homes<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n
<\/a>Although a lot of the information presented here has been explored in other books<\/a> and TV programmes (such as the BBC\u2019s The Love of Money<\/a>), to see it presented in a single film is both constructive and chilling.<\/p>\n